<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bonizack.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bonizack.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 19:59:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Savett v. Sealy Corp, Civil No. 1:11-cv-336 (M.D. N.C.)</title>
		<link>http://bonizack.com/savett-v-sealy-corp-civil-no-111-cv-336-m-d-n-c</link>
		<comments>http://bonizack.com/savett-v-sealy-corp-civil-no-111-cv-336-m-d-n-c#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bonizack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonizack.com/?p=240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Savett v. Sealy Corp, Civil No. 1:11-cv-336 (M.D. N.C.)
Boni &#38; Zack represents Sealy Corp. in its defense of this consumer class action brought by plaintiff Adam Savett for alleged violations of Sealy's warranty. Plaintiff claims that Sealy has a policy of denying warranty claims for replacement of a claimed defective mattress whenever a stain is present on the mattress. Sealy denies it has any such policy.
December 23, 2011 Update - The parties worked out a non-class action settlement, and plaintiff ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bonizack.com/savett-v-sealy-corp-civil-no-111-cv-336-m-d-n-c/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Billy Doe (a fictitious name) v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia, et al., No. 110702430 (Phila. County Ct. of Common Pleas)</title>
		<link>http://bonizack.com/billy-doe-a-fictitious-name-v-archdiocese-of-philadelphia-et-al-no-110702430-phila-county-ct-of-common-pleas</link>
		<comments>http://bonizack.com/billy-doe-a-fictitious-name-v-archdiocese-of-philadelphia-et-al-no-110702430-phila-county-ct-of-common-pleas#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bonizack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonizack.com/?p=233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Billy Doe (a fictitious name) v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia, et al., No. 110702430 (Phila. County Ct. of Common Pleas)
Boni &#38; Zack are co-counsel with the firm McLaughlin &#38; Lauricella in this clergy sexual abuse action against the Philadelphia Archdiocese, Cardinal Anthony Bevilaqua, Monsignor William Lynn, and three alleged sexual abusers of the plaintiff when he was ten years old, Father Charles Engelhardt, the defrocked priest William Avery and former catholic school teacher Bernard Shero. This gut wrenching case seeks to ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bonizack.com/billy-doe-a-fictitious-name-v-archdiocese-of-philadelphia-et-al-no-110702430-phila-county-ct-of-common-pleas/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Re Apple In-App Purchase Litigation, Master File No. 11-CV-1758</title>
		<link>http://bonizack.com/in-re-apple-in-app-purchase-litigation-master-file-no-11-cv-1758</link>
		<comments>http://bonizack.com/in-re-apple-in-app-purchase-litigation-master-file-no-11-cv-1758#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bonizack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonizack.com/?p=227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Re Apple In-App Purchase Litigation, Master File No. 11-CV-1758 (N.D. Cal.)
Boni &#38; Zack brought this class action on behalf of parents of children who bought hundreds of dollars of allegedly worthless "currency" in gaming applications that Apple targeted to young children. These applications, which plaintiffs refer to as "Bait Apps," are offered as free apps, but are really designed to entice children to buy items such as "smurfberries," "pouches of gold" and other virtual currency that Apple sells inside ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bonizack.com/in-re-apple-in-app-purchase-litigation-master-file-no-11-cv-1758/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News</title>
		<link>http://bonizack.com/news</link>
		<comments>http://bonizack.com/news#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonizack.com/?p=115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
In the Spotlight

November 2011 - Mike Boni was retained to represent Victim 1 and his mother in potential civil litigation against Jerry Sandusky and others. In connection with his representation, Mr. Boni appeared on numerous television news shows and was quoted in many newspaper articles about the Penn State U. story. For example, go to http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2011/12/13/am-sot-sanduskly-victim-one-attorney.cnn?iref=videosearch, http://www.myfoxphilly.com/dpp/sports/penn_state/attorney-for-victim-%231-speaks-to-fox-29-120611, and http://www.myfoxphilly.com/dpp/sports/penn_state/Jerry_Sandusky_Hearing_Victim_1_Attorneys_Speak_121211
March 2011 - Mike Boni was featured in the Penn Law Journal's cover story, "The New Digital Divide." Click here to read ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bonizack.com/news/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Authors Guild, et al. v. Google Inc., No. 05-CV-8136 (S.D.N.Y.)</title>
		<link>http://bonizack.com/the-authors-guild-et-al-v-google-inc-no-05-cv-8136-s-d-n-y</link>
		<comments>http://bonizack.com/the-authors-guild-et-al-v-google-inc-no-05-cv-8136-s-d-n-y#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonizack.com/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Authors Guild, et al. v. Google Inc., No. 05-CV-8136 (S.D.N.Y.)
This lawsuit challenges Google's plan to digitize, search, and show snippets of in-copyright books and to share digital copies with libraries without the explicit permission of the copyright owner. Under the plan, and as part of its Google Library Project, Google has digitized millions of books from leading libraries.
Boni &#38; Zack represents authors Paul Dickson, Joseph Goulden, Maureen Duffy, Daniel Jay Baum, Margaret Drabble, Robert Pullan, and the Authors Guild, ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bonizack.com/the-authors-guild-et-al-v-google-inc-no-05-cv-8136-s-d-n-y/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re: Blood Reagents Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 2081 (E.D. Pa.)</title>
		<link>http://bonizack.com/in-re-blood-reagents-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-2081-e-d-pa</link>
		<comments>http://bonizack.com/in-re-blood-reagents-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-2081-e-d-pa#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonizack.com/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In re: Blood Reagents Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 2081 (E.D. Pa.)
Boni &#038; Zack brought this lawsuit on behalf of a proposed class of direct purchasers of blood reagents and/or related medical equipment.  This antitrust action alleges that Defendants Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Inc., Johnson &#038; Johnson Health Care Systems, Inc., and Immucor, Inc. conspired, combined and contracted to fix, raise, maintain and stabilize prices at which blood reagents would be sold in the United States.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bonizack.com/in-re-blood-reagents-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-2081-e-d-pa/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re: Chase Bank USA, N.A., &#8220;Check Loan&#8221; Contract Litigation, MDL No. 2032 (N.D. Cal.)</title>
		<link>http://bonizack.com/in-re-chase-bank-usa-n-a-check-loan-contract-litigation-mdl-no-2032-n-d-cal</link>
		<comments>http://bonizack.com/in-re-chase-bank-usa-n-a-check-loan-contract-litigation-mdl-no-2032-n-d-cal#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonizack.com/?p=105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In re: Chase Bank USA, N.A., "Check Loan" Contract Litigation, MDL No. 2032 (N.D. Cal.)
Boni &#038; Zack represents plaintiffs in this class action lawsuit against JP Morgan Chase &#038; Co. and Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A., which has been brought on behalf of a class of customers who have been charged a monthly service fee on balance transfers to their Chase credit cards that have low, fixed APRs for the life of the loan.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bonizack.com/in-re-chase-bank-usa-n-a-check-loan-contract-litigation-mdl-no-2032-n-d-cal/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re: Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 1935 (M.D. Pa.)</title>
		<link>http://bonizack.com/in-re-chocolate-confectionary-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-1935-m-d-pa</link>
		<comments>http://bonizack.com/in-re-chocolate-confectionary-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-1935-m-d-pa#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonizack.com/in-re-chocolate-confectionary-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-1935-m-d-pa</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In re: Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 1935 (M.D. Pa.)
Boni &#038; Zack represents plaintiffs in this antitrust case brought on behalf of a proposed class of direct purchasers of chocolate confectionary products against Nestle S.A., Cadbury Schweppes plc, Mars Inc., Masterfoods USA, the Hershey Company, and several related entities.  The complaint alleges that defendants conspired to fix prices of chocolate confectionary products.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bonizack.com/in-re-chocolate-confectionary-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-1935-m-d-pa/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re: Fasteners Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 1912 (E.D. Pa.)</title>
		<link>http://bonizack.com/in-re-fasteners-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-1912-e-d-pa</link>
		<comments>http://bonizack.com/in-re-fasteners-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-1912-e-d-pa#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonizack.com/?p=102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In re: Fasteners Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 1912 (E.D. Pa.)
This class action lawsuit alleges that defendants - leading fasteners manufacturers - engaged in a conspiracy to fix prices and allocate customers and markets for fasteners, including zippers, snaps, hooks and eyes, and rivets used in apparel and footwear.  Boni &#038; Zack represents plaintiffs in this action, which follows a European Commission investigation into antitrust violations in the fasteners industry.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bonizack.com/in-re-fasteners-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-1912-e-d-pa/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re: Freelance Works in Literary Databases Copyright Litigation, MDL No. 1379 (S.D.N.Y.)</title>
		<link>http://bonizack.com/in-re-freelance-works-in-literary-databases-copyright-litigation-mdl-no-1379-s-d-n-y</link>
		<comments>http://bonizack.com/in-re-freelance-works-in-literary-databases-copyright-litigation-mdl-no-1379-s-d-n-y#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonizack.com/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In re: Freelance Works in Literary Databases Copyright Litigation, MDL No. 1379 (S.D.N.Y.)
Boni &#038; Zack is one of the Lead Counsel for a plaintiff class of freelance authors against major electronic databases such as Lexis/Nexis, Dow Jones Factiva, Dialog, and others.
The authors sold articles to newspapers or magazines for print publication but for no other purpose.  However, the print publications entered into licensing agreements with the databases, authorizing the databases to copy and sell the articles appearing in the ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bonizack.com/in-re-freelance-works-in-literary-databases-copyright-litigation-mdl-no-1379-s-d-n-y/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re: Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 2143</title>
		<link>http://bonizack.com/in-re-optical-disk-drive-products-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-2143</link>
		<comments>http://bonizack.com/in-re-optical-disk-drive-products-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-2143#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonizack.com/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In re: Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 2143
Boni &#038; Zack represents direct purchaser plaintiffs in this class action lawsuit alleging that major manufacturers of optical disc drives, including drives that play CDs, DVDs or Blu-Ray discs, conspired to fix prices. 
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bonizack.com/in-re-optical-disk-drive-products-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-2143/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re: Packaged Ice Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 1952 (E.D. Mich.)</title>
		<link>http://bonizack.com/in-re-packaged-ice-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-1952-e-d-mich</link>
		<comments>http://bonizack.com/in-re-packaged-ice-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-1952-e-d-mich#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonizack.com/?p=93</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In re: Packaged Ice Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 1952 (E.D. Mich.)
In this antitrust class action, Boni &#038; Zack represents plaintiffs who purchased packaged ice directly from defendants, including Reddy Ice, Arctic Glacier, and Home City Ice.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bonizack.com/in-re-packaged-ice-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-1952-e-d-mich/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re: Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 1720 (E.D.N.Y.)</title>
		<link>http://bonizack.com/in-re-payment-card-interchange-fee-and-merchant-discount-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-1720-e-d-n-y</link>
		<comments>http://bonizack.com/in-re-payment-card-interchange-fee-and-merchant-discount-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-1720-e-d-n-y#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonizack.com/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In re: Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 1720 (E.D.N.Y.)
This class action against the Visa and MasterCard credit card networks and their member banks alleges that the card networks and their member banks have conspired in violation of the antitrust laws to artificially raise "interchange fees," part of the fee that a merchant pays on each transaction made with a payment card. Boni &#038; Zack represents Parkway Corporation, a parking lot owner/operator.  This case ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bonizack.com/in-re-payment-card-interchange-fee-and-merchant-discount-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-1720-e-d-n-y/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re: Plasma-Derivative Protein Therapies Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 2109 (N.D. Ill.)</title>
		<link>http://bonizack.com/in-re-plasma-derivative-protein-therapies-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-2109-n-d-ill</link>
		<comments>http://bonizack.com/in-re-plasma-derivative-protein-therapies-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-2109-n-d-ill#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonizack.com/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In re: Plasma-Derivative Protein Therapies Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 2109 (N.D. Ill.)
Boni &#038; Zack represents plaintiffs in this class action against Baxter International, Inc., CSL Limited and CSL Behring alleging violations of the federal antitrust laws.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bonizack.com/in-re-plasma-derivative-protein-therapies-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-2109-n-d-ill/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re: Pre-Filled Propane Tank Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, MDL No. 2086 (W.D. Mo.)</title>
		<link>http://bonizack.com/in-re-pre-filled-propane-tank-marketing-and-sales-practices-litigation-mdl-no-2086-w-d-mo</link>
		<comments>http://bonizack.com/in-re-pre-filled-propane-tank-marketing-and-sales-practices-litigation-mdl-no-2086-w-d-mo#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonizack.com/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In re: Pre-Filled Propane Tank Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, MDL No. 2086 (W.D. Mo.)
Boni &#038; Zack represents plaintiffs in this consumer class action involving propane tanks sold by Ferrellgas (under the Blue Rhino brand) and AmeriGas for outdoor grills, heaters and other uses. The lawsuit alleges that defendants covertly increased the price of their pre-filled propane tanks by failing to disclose that they were under-filling the tanks.
This case arises out of this wrongful practice and seeks to provide a ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bonizack.com/in-re-pre-filled-propane-tank-marketing-and-sales-practices-litigation-mdl-no-2086-w-d-mo/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re: Puerto Rican Cabotage Antitrust Litigation, MDL. No. 1960 (D. P.R.)</title>
		<link>http://bonizack.com/in-re-puerto-rican-cabotage-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-1960-d-p-r</link>
		<comments>http://bonizack.com/in-re-puerto-rican-cabotage-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-1960-d-p-r#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonizack.com/?p=85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In re: Puerto Rican Cabotage Antitrust Litigation, MDL. No. 1960 (D. P.R.)
In this class action lawsuit, plaintiffs allege that Defendants Horizon Lines, Sea Star Lines, Crowley Liner Services and Trailer Bridge conspired to fix the prices for the sea transportation of goods or persons between Puerto Rico and the continental United States.  Boni &#038; Zack represents a proposed class of direct purchaser plaintiffs.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bonizack.com/in-re-puerto-rican-cabotage-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-1960-d-p-r/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re: Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 1869 (D.D.C.)</title>
		<link>http://bonizack.com/in-re-rail-freight-fuel-surcharge-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-1869-d-d-c</link>
		<comments>http://bonizack.com/in-re-rail-freight-fuel-surcharge-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-1869-d-d-c#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonizack.com/?p=83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In re: Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 1869 (D.D.C.)
Boni &#038; Zack represents plaintiffs in this class action lawsuit brought against the four largest railroad freight companies in the United States. This litigation alleges that BNSF Railway Company, CSX Transportation, Inc., Norfolk Southern Railway Company, and Union Pacific Railroad Company violated the Sherman Act by fixing the levels of rail freight fuel surcharges.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bonizack.com/in-re-rail-freight-fuel-surcharge-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-1869-d-d-c/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re: Refrigerant Compressors Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 2042 (E.D. Mich.)</title>
		<link>http://bonizack.com/in-re-refrigerant-compressors-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-2042-e-d-mich</link>
		<comments>http://bonizack.com/in-re-refrigerant-compressors-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-2042-e-d-mich#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonizack.com/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In re: Refrigerant Compressors Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 2042 (E.D. Mich.)
Boni &#038; Zack represents Kohlder Manufacturing Company, Inc. in this antitrust class action, which alleges a multinational conspiracy to fix the prices of refrigerant compressors.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bonizack.com/in-re-refrigerant-compressors-antitrust-litigation-mdl-no-2042-e-d-mich/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re: Replacement Filter Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1957 (N.D. Ill.)</title>
		<link>http://bonizack.com/in-re-replacement-filter-antitrust-litigation-mdl-1957-n-d-ill</link>
		<comments>http://bonizack.com/in-re-replacement-filter-antitrust-litigation-mdl-1957-n-d-ill#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonizack.com/?p=79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In re: Replacement Filter Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1957 (N.D. Ill.)
Boni &#038; Zack represents plaintiffs in a class action against manufacturers of replacement oil, air, fuel and transmission filters. The complaint alleges that defendants illegally conspired to fix, raise, maintain, and stabilize the price of filters at artificially inflated levels.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bonizack.com/in-re-replacement-filter-antitrust-litigation-mdl-1957-n-d-ill/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Standard Iron Works v. Arcelormittal, et al., No. 08-5214 (N.D. Ill.)</title>
		<link>http://bonizack.com/standard-iron-works-v-arcelormittal-et-al-no-08-5214-n-d-ill</link>
		<comments>http://bonizack.com/standard-iron-works-v-arcelormittal-et-al-no-08-5214-n-d-ill#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bonizack.com/?p=77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Standard Iron Works v. Arcelormittal, et al., No. 08-5214 (N.D. Ill.)
In an antitrust action brought on behalf of a putative nationwide class of steel purchasers, plaintiffs allege that defendants conspired to inflate the market price for steel.  Boni &#038; Zack represents direct purchaser plaintiffs. 
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bonizack.com/standard-iron-works-v-arcelormittal-et-al-no-08-5214-n-d-ill/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

